ISSN 1866-8836
Клеточная терапия и трансплантация

Graft-versus-Leukemia (GVL) activity in childhood leukemias

Claudia Rossig

University Children's Hospital Muenster, Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Muenster, Germany

Claudia Rossig, MD, University Children's Hospital Muenster, Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Albert-Schweitzer-Str. 33, D-48149, Münster, Germany
Phone: +49-251-835-2813, fax: +49-251-835-2804, E-mail:
doi 10.3205/ctt-2009-en-000049.01
Submitted 24 July 2009
Accepted 01 September 2009
Published 07 September 2009


Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) today contributes significantly to the cure of children with high-risk leukemias. The contribution of cellular graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) reactions to the anti-leukemic effects of allogeneic transplantation in pediatric leukemias has not been clarified in detail. Evidence is mainly based on indirect associations of clinical signs of alloreactivity with maintenance of full donor chimerism and relapse-free survival. Therapeutic interventions aimed at deliberately enhancing alloreactive donor cells via early reduction of immunosuppression or administration of donor lymphocytes are limited by the occurrence of graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD). Therefore, an important goal in advancing the use of allogeneic HSCT as treatment for childhood leukemias is the development of therapeutic strategies that induce or augment GVL effects while avoiding GVHD. One potential strategy relies on genetic modification of the receptor specificity of T cells or NK cells to recognize leukemia-associated antigens. Current efforts further focus on an optimal in vivo functionality of therapeutic T cells, including homing to the leukemia microenvironment, persistence, and capacity for specific reactivation.


leukemia, pediatric oncology, T cells, immunotherapy, adoptive T cell transfer

Evidence for GVL effects in childhood leukemias

The majority of childhood leukemias have become curable via multi-agent chemotherapy. In subsets of children with high risk molecular subtypes of leukemia, poor response to induction chemotherapy or disease relapse, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) today significantly contributes to relapse-free survival [1-3]. Both donor T cells and NK cells within the stem cell graft have been suggested to mediate potent anti-leukemic responses accounting for control of minimal residual disease and maintenance of remission. Unfortunately, data regarding the contribution of GVL activity to clinical disease control is limited by the lack of valid methods for assessing immunological rejection of leukemia cells by donor-derived immune effector cells in vivo. Indirect evidence is provided by correlations of relapse-free survival (RFS) with the extent of HLA compatibility between donor and recipient, or with the occurrence of acute or chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Furthermore, the effects of tapering immunosuppressive therapy or of administering donor lymphocyte infusions (DLIs) on either RFS or donor chimerism and/or minimal residual disease (MRD) are interpreted as evidence for the anti-leukemic activity of donor T cells.

One example in childhood leukemias is based on a case report demonstrating rapid return of donor chimerism and sustained remission in a patient with relapsed juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML) after HSCT in response to a single dose of DLIs [4]. JMML is a rare clonal myeloproliferative disorder of early childhood for which allogeneic HSCT is the only curative strategy, resulting in event-free survival of about 50% of the children [5]. In a larger series of 21 children who received DLIs for mixed chimerism or relapse after allogeneic HSCT, responses were found in six patients [6]. Five of the responders developed GVHD following DLI, thus arguing against the specific recognition of leukemia-associated antigens and demonstrating the limitations of this strategy by alloreactivity against non-hematopoietic targets.

While a large number of studies have demonstrated an important role of GVL effects in adult patients receiving allogeneic transplants for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) [7], experience in childhood AML is limited. Among 19 of 81 pediatric AML patients with increasing mixed chimerism, 15 children who received early immunological intervention had an increased probability for event-free survival (pEFS 36%) compared to the 4 patients without intervention (pEFS 0%, P<0.05) [8]. In another series of 13 children with high-risk AML in first or second remission, immunotherapeutic interventions after allogeneic HSCT, aiming at inducing limited GVHD, combined with a uniform myeloablative preparative regimen, yielded encouraging early results [9]. Studies in a larger number of children are needed to assess the potential benefits of inducing alloreactivity in childhood AML.

The role of GVL effects in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), including childhood ALL, is controversial. Suggestive for a contribution of alloreactivity to sustained remission after allogeneic HSCT was the observation that among 36 children with high-risk or relapsed ALL, relapses occurred only in those receiving transplants from HLA-matched sibling donors (MSD, 8/13), while children after alternative donor HSCT remained disease-free (0/13) [2]. A similar observation was reported from an independent cohort of 71 children, with a 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse of 55.6±12.3% for MSD versus 22.0±8.1% for MUD recipients (P=0.03) [10]. By contrast, a recent study demonstrated comparable outcomes of MSD (n=41) versus alternative donor transplantations (n=42) in children with ALL receiving an identical TBI-based preparative regimen, with alemtuzumab administered to alternative donor HSC recipients [11]. In summary, no definite conclusions can be drawn regarding potentially superior GVL effects of unrelated grafts and their contribution to the maintenance of remissions. An anti-leukemic effect of chronic GVHD in childhood ALL was suggested by the results of a retrospective analysis of 450 children receiving allogeneic HSCT for hematologic malignancies, demonstrating a significantly reduced relapse probability in patients with chronic GVHD [12]. Importantly, stratifying the analysis by type of malignancy revealed a stronger correlation of chronic GVHD with relapse-free survival in ALL compared to other types of malignancies.

An important goal in advancing allogeneic HSCT for childhood leukemias is the development of therapeutic strategies that induce or augment GVL effects while avoiding clinical GVHD caused by alloreactivity with normal cells. In adults, administration of donor lymphocytes after HSCT has become an established treatment for high-risk myeloid malignancies [13]. The role of DLIs in childhood leukemias is less clear. In a cohort of 23 children with high-risk ALL, transfer of donor lymphocytes to children with decreasing donor chimerism prevented relapse in at least a proportion of patients [14]. However, unselected DLIs fail to rescue the majority of the children, and clinical GVHD remains a significant limitation to increasing cell doses. Efficient strategies for separating leukemia-reactive donor T cells from those responsible for GVHD are not yet available. While selective depletion of alloreactive T cells by an anti-CD25 immunotoxin prior to infusion of donor T cells following T-cell-depleted haploidentical SCT efficiently prevented GVHD [15], 7 of the 16 patients with malignant diseases in this cohort relapsed, arguing against preserved anti-leukemic responses after allodepletion.

Strategies for augmenting GVL effects in childhood leukemia

One means of generating large numbers of leukemia-specific T cells is genetic modification with antigen-specific chimeric receptors (CARs). CARs consist of an antibody-derived single chain Fv domain linked to a cytoplasmic signaling domain, generally derived from the T cell receptor (TCR) ζ chain [16]. Thereby, they redirect the T-cell effector function to a defined surface antigen and allow for the recognition of target cells in an HLA-independent manner. Increased awareness of the importance of co-stimulatory signaling in T cell activation has led to the design of “second-generation” CARs with co-stimulatory signaling components. These optimized CARs indeed promote superior T cell proliferation, persistence and tumor control in vivo [17, 18]. Recently, T cells expressing antigen-specific CARs have entered the first clinical trials [19-21]. While CAR gene-modified polyclonal donor T cells can mediate alloreactivity via their native receptors, genetic engineering of T cells with native specificity for a viral antigen may reduce the risk of GVHD while contributing to the reconstitution of virus-specific immune responses following HSCT [22, 23].

The specificity and efficacy of the approach depend on the choice of an appropriate target antigen expressed at high densities on the leukemia cells. An attractive target structure for B-cell malignancies, including B-cell precursor ALL of childhood, is the B-lineage antigen CD19. The specificity of CD19 for the leukemic clone is limited by co-expression on normal B precursor cells and B cells, which will result in a transient defect of B-cell maturation as an undesired side effect of effective CD19-directed immunotherapy. CD19-specific CARs have been shown by various investigators to mediate potent anti-leukemic T-cell responses both in vitro and in vivo [24-26], and their therapeutic efficacy is being evaluated in ongoing clinical studies.

Besides modifying the antigen specificity of T cells, CARs can be used to redirect natural killer cells (NK cells) to leukemia cells. Alloreactive NK cells have been shown to persist in pediatric patients following KIR ligand-mismatched haploidentical HSCT, and are considered as being important players in anti-leukemic cellular immune responses after transplantation [27]. Protocols for the large-scale in vitro activation and expansion of human NK cells for adoptive transfer have been developed [28]. Expression of CD19-specific CARs in human NK cells [29, 30] triggers powerful and antigen-specific stimulatory signals, inducing cytolysis of otherwise NK-cell resistant leukemia cell lines and autologous leukemia cells [29, 31].

Key issues regarding long-term control of leukemia by cellular immunotherapies are in vivo persistence and functional reactivation of the transferred effector cell populations within the immunosuppressive leukemic microenvironment. Dual-specific T cells with native specificity for a strong viral antigen, e.g. EBV, reengineered to interact with leukemia-associated antigens via CARs, may have superior persistence in vivo and receive potent reactivation stimuli via CARs. Indeed, CAR-transduced EBV-CTLs have been shown to persist for several weeks in the peripheral blood of neuroblastoma patients [21]. Alternative designs of dual-specific T-cells, e.g. carrying a specificity against varicella-zoster virus, might even allow for vaccination strategies to boost and prolong the presence of specific effector cells in vivo [22].

Persistence of gene-modified T cells was further shown when the transfer of gene-modified T cells was preceded by a lymphodepletive regimen [32], which was attributed to a favorable homeostatic cytokine environment and by elimination of regulatory T cells. Selective depletion of regulatory T cells by the CD25-specific antibody denileukin difitox in melanoma patients enhanced the efficacy of a tumor vaccine; however, responsive patients also had severe autoimmune manifestations [33]. Therefore, selective elimination of regulatory T cells in patients after allogeneic HSCT, will likely induce or augment clinical GVHD – again illustrating the dilemma of obtaining a favorable balance between GVL and GVHD.


Specific cellular immunotherapeutic strategies may prove effective in preventing relapse in children who cannot be cured by allogeneic HSCT alone. Using molecular minimal residual disease monitoring, patients with the highest risk of relapse can now be identified prior to HSCT[1], thus providing a platform for evaluation of the efficacy of immune-based strategies. Besides maximal reduction of leukemia bulk prior to cellular therapy, selective depletion of regulatory T cells, as well as generation of an optimized cytokine milieu and subsequent boosting of anti-leukemic immune responses by vaccination may contribute to generating therapeutic GVL effects (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Implementation of immunotherapeutic strategies into the treatment of high-risk childhood leukemia



1. Bader P, Eckert C, Kreyenberg H, et al. Predictive Value of Mrd Prior to Allogeneic Sct in Relapsed Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia - Analysis of the All-Rez Bfm Group. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. 2008;14:23.

2. Schrauder A, Reiter A, Gadner H, et al. Superiority of allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation compared with chemotherapy alone in high-risk childhood T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results from ALL-BFM 90 and 95. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:5742-5749. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.2679.

3. Borgmann A, von Stackelberg A, Hartmann R, et al. Unrelated donor stem cell transplantation compared with chemotherapy for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in a second remission: a matched-pair analysis. Blood. 2003;101:3835-3839.

4. Worth A, Rao K, Webb D, et al. Successful treatment of juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia relapsing after stem cell transplantation using donor lymphocyte infusion. Blood. 2003;101:1713-1714.

5. Locatelli F, Nollke P, Zecca M, et al. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in children with juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML): results of the EWOG-MDS/EBMT trial. Blood. 2005;105:410-419. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-05-1944.

6. Yoshimi A, Bader P, Matthes-Martin S, et al. Donor leukocyte infusion after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia. Leukemia. 2005;19:971-977.

7. Schmid C, Labopin M, Nagler A, et al. Donor lymphocyte infusion in the treatment of first hematological relapse after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation in adults with acute myeloid leukemia: a retrospective risk factors analysis and comparison with other strategies by the EBMT Acute Leukemia Working Party. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:4938-4945. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.6053.

8. Bader P, Kreyenberg H, Hoelle W, et al. Increasing mixed chimerism defines a high-risk group of childhood acute myelogenous leukemia patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation where pre-emptive immunotherapy may be effective. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2004;33:815-821. doi:10.1038/sj.bmt.1704444.

9. Bonanomi S, Connor P, Webb D, et al. Successful outcome of allo-SCT in high-risk pediatric AML using chemotherapy-only conditioning and post transplant immunotherapy. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2008;42:253-257. doi:10.1038/bmt.2008.160.

10. Gassas A, Sung L, Saunders EF, Doyle J. Graft-versus-leukemia effect in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia: significantly lower relapse rate in unrelated transplantations. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2007;40:951-955. doi:10.1038/sj.bmt.1705853.

11. Kennedy-Nasser AA, Bollard CM, Myers GD, et al. Comparable outcome of alternative donor and matched sibling donor hematopoietic stem cell transplant for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first or second remission using alemtuzumab in a myeloablative conditioning regimen. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008;14:1245-1252.

12. Zecca M, Prete A, Rondelli R, et al. Chronic graft-versus-host disease in children: incidence, risk factors, and impact on outcome. Blood. 2002;100:1192-1200. doi: 10.1182/blood-2001-11-0059.

13. Kolb HJ. Graft-versus-leukemia effects of transplantation and donor lymphocytes. Blood. 2008;112:4371-4383.

14. Bader P, Kreyenberg H, Hoelle W, et al. Increasing mixed chimerism is an important prognostic factor for unfavorable outcome in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation: possible role for pre-emptive immunotherapy? J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:1696-1705. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.05.198.

15. Amrolia PJ, Muccioli-Casadei G, Huls H, et al. Adoptive immunotherapy with allodepleted donor T-cells improves immune reconstitution after haploidentical stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2006;108:1797-1808. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-02-001909.

16. Eshhar Z, Waks T, Gross G, Schindler DG. Specific activation and targeting of cytotoxic lymphocytes through chimeric single chains consisting of antibody-binding domains and the gamma or zeta subunits of the immunoglobulin and T-cell receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90:720-724. pmcid: 45737.

17. Finney HM, Lawson AD, Bebbington CR, Weir AN. Chimeric receptors providing both primary and costimulatory signaling in T cells from a single gene product. J Immunol. 1998;161:2791-2797.

18. Maher J, Brentjens RJ, Gunset G, Riviere I, Sadelain M. Human T-lymphocyte cytotoxicity and proliferation directed by a single chimeric TCRzeta /CD28 receptor. Nat Biotechnol. 2002;20:70-75.

19. Kershaw MH, Westwood JA, Parker LL, et al. A phase I study on adoptive immunotherapy using gene-modified T cells for ovarian cancer. Clinical Cancer Research. 2006;12:6106-6115.

20. Till BG, Jensen MC, Wang J, Chen EY, Wood BL, Greisman HA, et al. Adoptive immunotherapy for indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma using genetically modified autologous CD20-specific T cells. Blood. 2008;112:2261-2271.

21. Pule MA, Savoldo B, Myers GD, et al. Virus-specific T cells engineered to coexpress tumor-specific receptors: persistence and antitumor activity in individuals with neuroblastoma. Nat Med. 2008;14:1264-1270.

22. Landmeier S, Altvater B, Pscherer S, et al. Gene-engineered varicella-zoster virus reactive CD4+ cytotoxic T cells exert tumor-specific effector function. Cancer Res. 2007;67:8335-8343. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4426.

23. Rossig C, Bollard CM, Nuchtern JG, Rooney CM, Brenner MK. Epstein-Barr virus-specific human T lymphocytes expressing antitumor chimeric T-cell receptors: potential for improved immunotherapy. Blood. 2002;99:2009-2016.

24. Brentjens RJ, Latouche JB, Santos E, et al. Eradication of systemic B-cell tumors by genetically targeted human T lymphocytes co-stimulated by CD80 and interleukin-15. Nature Medicine. 2003;9:279-286.

25. Cooper LJN, Topp MS, Serrano LM, et al. T-cell clones can be rendered specific for CD19: toward the selective augmentation of the graft-versus-B-lineage leukemia effect. Blood. 2003;101:1637-1644.

26. Rossig C, Pscherer S, Landmeier S, et al. Adoptive cellular immunotherapy with CD19-specific T cells. Klin Padiatr. 2005;217:351-356.

27. Pende D, Marcenaro S, Falco M, et al. Anti-leukemia activity of alloreactive NK cells in KIR ligand-mismatched haploidentical HSCT for pediatric patients: evaluation of the functional role of activating KIR and redefinition of inhibitory KIR specificity. Blood. 2009;113:3119-3129.

28. Fujisaki H, Kakuda H, Shimasaki N, et al. Expansion of highly cytotoxic human natural killer cells for cancer cell therapy. Cancer Res. 2009;69:4010-4017.

29. Imai C, Iwamoto S, Campana D. Genetic modification of primary natural killer cells overcomes inhibitory signals and induces specific killing of leukemic cells. Blood. 2005;106:376-383. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-12-4797.

30. Kruschinski A, Moosmann A, Poschke I, et al. Engineering antigen-specific primary human NK cells against HER-2 positive carcinomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:17481-17486. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804788105.

31. Altvater B, Landmeier S, Pscherer S, Temme J, Schweer K, Kailayangiri S, et al. 2B4 (CD244) signaling by recombinant antigen-specific chimeric receptors costimulates natural killer cell activation to leukemia and neuroblastoma cells. Clinical Cancer Research in press. 2009.

32. Morgan RA, Dudley ME, Wunderlich JR, et al. Cancer regression in patients after transfer of genetically engineered lymphocytes. Science. 2006;314:126-129. doi: 10.1126/science.1129003.

33. Morse MA, Hobeika AC, Osada T et al. Depletion of human regulatory T cells specifically enhances antigen-specific immune responses to cancer vaccines. Blood. 2008;112:610-618. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-01-135319.

Volume 2, Number 2(6)

Download PDF version

doi 10.3205/ctt-2009-en-000049.01
Submitted 24 July 2009
Accepted 01 September 2009
Published 07 September 2009

Back to the list